We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is Why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 625 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

 

406 New Members signed up the last 30 days!

satisfaction-guaranteed

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags: ,


Forum Replies

  1. Hello Rene,
    about access-list, I have to read in this way: for prefix 1.1.1.0/24
    my local router in which run ospf,rip and Eigrp have to put in routing table that one learned by Rip…is it correct my reasoning?
    well we use access-list to permit that prefix is handle only by rip?

  2. I don’t get this:

    James(config-router)#distance 70 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 MY_PREFIXES

    What is the meaning of 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255?

  3. Hi Crytsuone,

    0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 refers to all networks. If we wouldn’t specify the access-list, the AD would change for all networks.

    Rene

  4. Hi David,

    Good question. Administrative distance is always local…it’s never shared between routers.

    Rene

  5. Hi Robert,

    It is possible but you might have to get a bit creative. You could IP SLA and conditional advertising. Here’s an example I created once for RIP:

    RIP Reliable Default Route

    You can do something similar for OSPF or EIGRP.

    Rene

17 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum